Welcome to destall.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Van der Waerden number

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Van der Waerden's theorem states that for any positive integers r and k there exists a positive integer N such that if the integers {1, 2, ..., N} are colored, each with one of r different colors, then there are at least k integers in arithmetic progression all of the same color. The smallest such N is the van der Waerden number W(r,k). Van der Waerden numbers are primitive recursive, as proved by Shelah;[1] in fact he proved that they are (at most) on the fifth level \mathcal{E}^5 of the Grzegorczyk hierarchy.

W(1,k)=k for any integer k, since one color produces only trivial colorings RRRRR...RRR (for the single color denoted R). W(r,2)=r+1, since we may construct a coloring that avoids arithmetic progressions of length 2 by using each color at most once, but once we use a color twice, a length 2 arithmetic progression is formed (e.g., for r=3, the longest coloring we can get that avoids an arithmetic progression of length 2 is RGB).

There are only a few known nontrivial van der Waerden numbers. Bounds in this table taken from Heule 2008[2] except where otherwise noted.

r\k 3 4 5 6 7 8
2 colors 9   35   178   1,132   > 3,703   > 11,495  
3 colors 27   > 292   > 2,173   > 11,191   > 43,855   > 238,400  
4 colors 76   > 1,048   > 17,705   > 91,331   > 393,469  
5 colors > 170   > 2,254   > 98,740   > 540,025  
6 colors > 207   > 9,778   > 98,748   > 633,981  

Van der Waerden numbers with r ≥ 2 are bounded by

W(r,k)\le 2^{2^{r^{2^{2^{k+9}}}}}

as proved by Timothy Gowers.[3]

2-color van der Waerden numbers are bounded by

p2^p\le W(2,p+1)

where p is prime, as proved by Berlekamp.[4]

One sometimes also writes w(k1, k2, ..., kr) to mean the smallest number w such that any coloring of the integers { 1, 2, ..., w } with r colors contains a progression of length ki of color i, for some i. Such numbers are called off-diagonal van der Waerden numbers. Thus W(r, k) = w(k, k, ..., k) with r arguments. w(4, 3, 3) is known to be exactly 51.[5]

[edit] References

  1. ^ Shelah, S. "Primitive Recursive Bounds for van der Waerden Numbers." Journal of the American Mathematical Society 1 (1988), pp. 683–697.
  2. ^ Marijn Heule, presentation at http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/sat/slides/waerden.pdf
  3. ^ Gowers, W. T., "A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem", Geometric and Functional Analysis 11 (2001), pp. 465–588.
  4. ^ Berlekamp, E., "A construction for partitions which avoid long arithmetic progressions", Canadian Mathematics Bulletin 11 (1968), pp. 409–414.
  5. ^ Brown, Tom C. (2006). "A partition of the non-negative integers, with applications to Ramsey theory". in M. Sethumadhavan. Discrete Mathematics And Its Applications. Alpha Science Int'l Ltd.. p. 80. ISBN 8173197318. 
  • Landman, Bruce; Aaron Robertson (Jan 2004). Ramsey Theory on the Integers. American Mathematical Society. p. 317. 
  • P.R. Herwig, M.J.H. Heule, P.M. van Lambalgen, H. van Maaren. "A New Method to Construct Lower Bounds for Van der Waerden Numbers", The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 14:1 (2007).
  • Kouril, M., Paul, J.L., "The Van der Waerden number W(2,6) is 1132". Experimental Mathematics 17 (2008), pp. 53–61.

[edit] External links

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs