Welcome to destall.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Talk:Ink and wash painting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Visual arts (Rated Start-Class)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
WikiProject China     (Rated Start-Class)
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
WikiProject Japan (Rated Start-Class)
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I took my first lesson in Sumi-e two weeks ago. I haven't painted in over 6 years--it felt quite liberating to feel the brush touch the ink then paper. As I practice on my own time I find it so soothing and relaxing. I see the power and passion coming through the strokes.

[edit] Sumi-e etc.


水墨畫 is a Chinese way of painting. Sumi-e is only a Japanese name for the same thing.


This page should merge with Suiboku.

Under which name? I note on the Suiboku article that all the prominent artists named are Japanese. Exploding Boy 20:46, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
Well, both names are transliterated Japanese words, so Chinese v. Japanese bias hardly enters into it. Google gives far more results for sumi-e (460k v 7k), so I guess we should make that the main article title. I also think sumi-e is probably a better known to English speakers of the two terms. Although I may just think that because of the Photoshop filter called sumi-e. --Carl 04:54, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This is a very late note on the above brief discussion.
At some stage the name of the article became "Ink and wash painting", and the Chinese and Korean names were added. This is a big step forward, as the Chinese were the originators of this art and the Koreans are also masters at it.
However, sumi-e is probably the best known name in English for this art form. Suibokuga, shuimohua, and sumukhwa are all less well known. That is why I've reversed the informal "pecking order" that seems to have become established among many editors, which puts Chinese first, Japanese second, and Korean third (Vietnamese is usually fourth).
I'm not sure how this "pecking order" has come about. The thinking seems to be that "China is the originator and should come first, Japanese is best known and of greatest importance after China, so it should come second, Korean is minor and should come last. Vietnam? Isn't that part of S. E. Asia?" Indeed, since Vietnam is an economically backward nation in the modern world and no longer uses Chinese characters, it hardly rates a mention.
The trouble is that this pecking order is poorly motivated and smacks of POV. For instance, if "historical priority" is the main criterion, Korean should come before Japanese, given that much Chinese culture first came to Korea before being transmitted to Japan. And Vietnam was part of China for a thousand years, unlike Japan, which was never subject to China. So Vietnam should possibly precede Japan, too. Of course, such a result would be considered rather "unconventional". People who want to put Japan in its place (which means, after China) thus end up putting the names in the above pecking order of "national importance".
Rather than follow the informal pecking order, however, it could equally be argued that the terms most familiar to English speakers should come first. Sumi-e is known by a lot of people whereas neither shuimo hua nor sumukhwa is particularly well known. If the article is written from the point of view of the English speaker rather than from a point of view of "putting Japan in its place", then sumi-e should be placed in first position and not relegated to a secondary place in the list of "Oriental names".
It's from this point of view that I've again placed sumi-e first after it was shifted back to the familiar "pecking order" by another editor.
Bathrobe (talk) 11:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] links

You might want to take a look through your external links section-- I found one that wasn't related to painting at all, and another that was in japanese and therefore unintelligible to almost any wikipedia user; I didn't look at all of them, but I'm sure that some better refrences can be found. Ahudson 17:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vietnam

I believe this form of art (and depiction of the Four Gentlemen) is also practiced in Vietnam. Badagnani (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs