Welcome to destall.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Shapiro's lemma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, especially in the areas of abstract algebra dealing with group cohomology or relative homological algebra, Shapiro's lemma, also known as the Eckmann–Shapiro lemma, relates extensions of modules over one ring to extensions over another, especially the group ring of a group and of a subgroup. It thus relates the group cohomology with respect to a group to the cohomology with respect to a subgroup.

Contents

[edit] Statement for rings

Let RS be a ring homomorphism, so that S becomes a left and right R-module. Let M be a left S-module and N a left R-module. By restriction of scalars, M is also a left R-module.

  • If S is projective as a right R-module, then:
\operatorname{Ext}^n_R(N, {}_R M) \cong \operatorname{Ext}^n_S(S \otimes_R N, M)
  • If S is projective as a left R-module, then:
\operatorname{Ext}^n_R({}_R M,N) \cong \operatorname{Ext}^n_S(M,\operatorname{Hom}_R(S,N))

See (Benson 1991, p. 47).

[edit] Statement for group rings

When H is a subgroup of finite index in G, then the group ring R[G] is finitely generated projective as a left and right R[H] module, so the previous applies in a simple way. Let M be a finite dimensional representation of G and N a finite dimensional representation of H. In this case, the module SR N is called the induced representation of N from H to G, and RM is called the restricted representation of M from G to H. One has that:

\operatorname{Ext}^n_G( M, N\uparrow_H^G) \cong \operatorname{Ext}^n_H( M\downarrow_H^G, N)

When n = 0, this is called Frobenius reciprocity for completely reducible modules, and Nakayama reciprocity in general. See (Benson 1991, p. 60), which also contains these higher versions of the Mackey decomposition.

[edit] Statement for group cohomology

Specializing M to be the trivial module produces the familiar Shapiro's lemma. Let H be a subgroup of G, and N isa representation of H. For NG the induced representation of N from H to G using the tensor product, and for H* the group homology:

H*(G, NG) = H*(H, N)

Similarly, for NG the co-induced representation of N from H to G using the Hom functor, and for H* the group cohomology:

H*(G, NG) = H*(H, N)

When H is finite index in G, then the induced and coinduced representations coincide and the lemma is valid for both homology and cohomology.

See (Weibel, p. 172).

[edit] References

Personal tools
Languages

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs